Case study

We found a website impersonating an escrow company. We got it taken down.

Veto checked the website against California public records, confirmed that it was not affiliated with the licensed company, saved the evidence, and reported it. The website was offline five days later.

Veto

Redacted preserved screenshot of the impersonating escrow website
Preserved July 10, 2026. Victim identity redacted.

What we found

On July 10, 2026, Veto found a website using the name of a real, licensed California escrow company.

The site looked professionally made. It described escrow services, showed customer reviews and company logos, and invited people to start transactions.

What did not match

Veto compared the website with the California DFPI public record for the licensed company.

Preserved section showing company logos used as trust signals on the impersonating website
The impersonating website displayed these company logos as trusted partners. The victim company’s identity has been removed.

Three details did not match:

  • The phone number was a placeholder, not a working business number.
  • The address did not match the address in the DFPI public record.
  • The support email used the impersonating website’s domain, not the licensed company’s domain.

How we confirmed it

Veto contacted the licensed escrow company directly and shared what we had found.

The company’s outside counsel confirmed that the website was not affiliated with the licensed company.

Veto did not contact the impersonating website or submit information through it. We preserved dated copies of the pages and the contact details shown on the site.

What Veto recorded

Public record checked

California DFPI business record

Problem found

The address and contact details did not match

Company contacted

Outside counsel confirmed the website was not affiliated

Evidence saved

Dated pages, contact details, and observation times

Reports filed

Registrar, hosting provider, California DFPI, and FBI IC3

We found the same details on other websites

The same incorrect address and placeholder phone number appeared on other, unrelated websites.

Veto did not claim that the websites had the same owner. We reported that the repeated details suggested the same website template may have been reused.

The website was taken down

Veto reported the website to the domain registrar, the hosting provider, California DFPI, and FBI IC3.

The hosting provider blocked the website’s IP address within 48 hours. The registrar took the website offline on July 15, five days after Veto found it.

Page stating that the impersonating website’s hosting account has been suspended
The impersonating website after its hosting account was suspended.

Why escrow offices should care

A professional website, business name, and license number can all be copied.

If a transaction is questioned later, the office may need to show what information it had, what it checked, what did not match, and why it made its decision.

Keeping that information together can also help the office see problems before money is sent.

What Veto does

Veto records what the escrow office checked, what questions remained, who reviewed the information, and what the office decided.

The record helps the office make a more informed decision before money is sent. It also shows the work the office completed if the decision is questioned later.

See a sample Review Record

There’s more to Veto

  • The office keeps authority

    Veto records the review. An authorized person still decides whether to approve a request or release funds.

  • Assistant prepares the work

    Assistant organizes the file and brings only the conflicts that require judgment.

  • Changes stay versioned

    A later fact replaces an earlier one without erasing the history of what changed.

  • The Review Record stays reconstructable

    What was checked, what stayed open, who reviewed it, and what the office decided remain on the file.

  • No invented insurance or prices

    Veto does not insure the wire. Early-access pricing is not a public Plus or Pro rate card.

Put one real file through Veto.

See how checks, evidence, corrections, and the office decision stay connected in one Review Record.

Prefer to look first? See a sample Review Record.

Disclaimers and footnotes

Veto records evidence and workflow events for escrow wire reviews. The escrow office owns the file context, approval, and decision.

Veto does not guarantee that fraud or loss will never occur. Required-check failures and identity mismatches remain visible and can block release or sending according to office policy.