Case 01

The Policy On Paper

Establishment of liability when internal verification policies are bypassed during a BEC incident.

Monota v. Escrow Network Group (LA Superior Court 2024)

Documented Loss

$931,004

The point of these briefs is not spectacle. It is to show how thin the fallback assumptions become once the wire is already in motion.

What Failed

The fraud worked because the office relied on the instruction packet itself instead of a separate, durable verification record.

What The Case Proves

Personal diligence is not the defense. The record is the defense. If the file cannot prove how the desk verified the destination before the wire left, the agency is exposed after the fact.

Why Veto Exists

Veto creates a sealed closing-file record before release, so the proof of process exists before the loss, not during the cleanup.

Veto

Wire verification for independent escrow agencies. Built for the closing-file record.

Strategic Advisor
Michael Benardo
Former FDIC Associate Director,
Cyber Fraud & Financial Crimes
Escrow Institute of California Member

Veto verifies routing details against Federal Reserve routing data and local trust checks available at verification time. It creates a record that the desk checked before release. It does not guarantee wire instruction authenticity, account ownership, or replace independent review by authorized staff.

© 2026 Veto Wire Verification.